

Exclusive Arsenal Offside Interview with Darren Fletcher
By: Martin | November 9th, 2009
On the heels of third-place Manchester United’s loss to Chelsea yesterday, Darren Fletcher made the claim that he had only been called for a foul on Ashley Cole because of comments Arsene Wenger had made in the media two months ago (comments which did not even mention Darren Fletcher’s name). We here at the Arsenal Offside found these comments curious, and it seemed like a bizarre and misguided attempt to deflect attention from third-place Manchester United’s shortcomings in the match and to try to drag Arsenal into the discussion. So we arranged an interview with Fletcher, who kindly took the time to explain his comments to us. Interview transcript after the jump:
The Arsenal Offside (TAO): Darren, first off, thanks for joining us here.
Darren Fletcher (DF): No problem, I’m glad for the opportunity to clarify my comments.
TAO: Sure. Now, you said that you were only called for the foul which led to Chelsea’s winning goal because of comments Arsene Wenger made in the press two months ago.
DF: Correct. You say that like it’s an outlandish claim.
TAO: Well, I just think that most people would say blaming a loss on a manager who was not involved in the game because he made vague comments about how third-place Manchester United played “anti-football” and didn’t even mention you by name two months ago is taking the blame game to new and unforeseen levels, even for third-place Manchester United.
DF: Well, how would you explain it? What do you think, that we somehow just lost because, like, what, the other team was better than us? NOW who’s being ridiculous?
TAO: It just doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. For one thing, if the referees were influenced by anything Arsene Wenger said, it seems like referees would crack down on clubs which play anti-football against Arsenal, which certainly hasn’t been the case. Secondly, if they wanted to crack down on malicious fouls, it seems unbelievable that they wouldn’t crack down on Chelsea. Finally, um…if they were after you because of your reputation, you probably would have been called for any of the half-dozen or so bookable offenses you committed before you got called for Ashley Cole.
DF: See, you’re just wrong. I also wanted to address that last bit you said, about me committing all those fouls. That just didn’t happen. I saw the replays, but I can tell you now that all of that was doctored to make it look like I was committing those easily-bookable fouls. They used CGI and trick photography in a deliberate attempt to make Chelsea look good and [ed: third-place] us look bad. It’s the same technology they used in “Jurassic Park” and “Lord of the Rings.”
TAO: Wait—let me understand this correctly. You’re claiming that the live video feed of the game was doctored by someone in a deliberate attempt to make Chelsea look better than third-place Manchester United? That’s quite a claim—who are “they?”
DF: (chuckles) Come on, Martin, you’re so naïve. It’s the Russian mafia, man! They’re in league with Roman Abramovich and the FA to form a Premiership shadow government that makes sure Chelsea wins the league.
TAO: Why would the FA want Chelsea to win?
DF: I have never told anyone this, but for the past several years, I have on multiple occasions been visited in dreams by a giant, grotesque creature who identifies himself only as “the dark troll.” As a young boy, my dream was to play for [ed: third-place] Manchester United, and one night the dark troll told me to gather up seven live kittens, a pound of cheese, and VHS copies of Rocky III and Rocky IV. I was to place those items in a basket under the bridge near my house that night, and if I did, the dark troll promised that all my dreams would come true. I followed his instructions exactly, and the next day, the basket was gone. That afternoon, I was contacted and offered scholarship terms from [ed: third-place] Manchester United. Ever since, I have done the bidding of the dark troll when asked and not questioned his powers of foresight. The dark troll recently informed me in a dream that FA Chairman Lord Triesman is also under his spell, and has been told in no uncertain terms that if Chelsea fails to win the league this year, Lady GaGa will assassinate Nelson Mandela. So obviously the FA has decided to ensure Chelsea’s triumph to preserve the life of the great South African leader. It’s as plain as day. Besides, something clearly is going on here–I suppose next you’re going to tell me that you think Terry actually headed that ball cleanly into the net?
TAO: You’re saying he didn’t?
DF: Absolutely not! Watch the video closely, broken down frame by frame, and you’ll see that when the ball came off his head, it was headed well wide of the post, but then it suddenly curved—in mid-air, mind you—back into the corner of the goal. It’s done using magnets. Here’s how it works: Russian Mafia/FA operatives plant super-strong uranium-infused negative-polarized magnets around the back of the net Chelsea is attacking, and put super-strong uranium-infused positive-polarized magnets in the goalposts of the goal [ed: third-place] Manchester United is attacking. Then the ball itself is lined externally with positive-polarized magnets, so the ball is magnetically pulled into the back of the net when Chelsea shoots, and is magnetically repelled away from the goal whenever a [ed: third-place] Manchester United player shoots.
TAO: But that doesn’t even make sense, since the teams switch goals at half-time.
DF: (Sighs deeply) I guess I have to spell out everything for you—the magnetic polarization is obviously computer activated and controlled, so Russian mafia operatives switch the polarization of the goal magnets from a satellite-connected Moscow supercomputer at half-time. How else would you explain the fact that we only got two shots on goal the entire match?
TAO: A crap midfield? A complete and utter lack of link-up play, forcing you to just hoof the ball upfield? Rooney being forced to constantly come back deep into his own half just to touch the ball? Poor wing play which didn’t force Chelsea’s diamond formation to stretch out wide at all? Failure to capitalize on your huge advantage in corner kicks? No impact subs? Tendency to…
DF: (Interrupting) Look, if you’re going to talk CRAZY like that, this interview is over. (hangs up phone)
Well, there you have it. We know from listening to Alex Ferguson over the years that third-place Manchester United have never ever been outplayed, they only occasionally lose or draw when the referee or some other outside factor conspires to cheat them out of the game. So the culprits this time, according to Darren Fletcher, are, respectively: Arsene Wenger, the Russian mafia, CGI, the FA, magnets, and the dark troll. Many thanks to Darren for sitting down with us and reminding us what dignified and gracious losers third-place Manchester United are.
And just because I’m a risk-averse attorney: This was, quite obviously, parody, and the interview was completely fabricated. It was a result of boredom at work and preemptive boredom with the international break.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Arsenal | |||
| Arsenal Scores | Emirates Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



“(Sighs deeply) I guess I have to spell out everything for you”
lol…Epic!!
Posted from
United States

-



http://therepublikofmancunia.com/what-do-the-press-make-of-the-robbery-at-the-bridge/
i think you might’ve watched the wrong match, martin, seriously. if there was one game so far this season where we were outplayed and the result was unfair it was probably against arsenal. every match report i’ve seen that was from an “objective” source says we outplayed them. every liverpool or arsenal fan i’ve seen talk about says we were outplayed..which is hysterical because we were actually outplayed by both of those teams but not chelsea. is the angle to needle us over not being the top of the table? it’s working.
Posted from
United States

-



Ha! Very good.
I might be misguided in saying this, but perhaps Man U this year is like last year’s Arsenal, and Rooney is their RvP.
Posted from
United States

-



Brilliant :> It’s either us or Arsenal for the title. End of discussion
Posted from


-



Not funny.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



Well, the angle is partly to needle you over being in third place, but mainly just to point out that (third-place) Manchester United’s knee-jerk reaction to any loss is not to examine any flaws within the club, but to instead look outwards to lash out and blame an external culprit. I can’t even remember the last time United lost a league game and Fergie didn’t immediately make the refereeing the issue. And Fletcher trying to blame something Wenger said two months ago for having an impact on the game is beyond ludicrous.
As to the game itself, I watched it and thought it was a pretty even match. Maybe United were slightly better, but to call the loss a “robbery” (as the post you linked to does) is a bit ludicrous–if you can only get 2 shots on goal, it’s hard to claim you deserved victory.
I would say that I still think United are legit title contenders, though, for 3 main reasons: (1) they’re at basically the same point, points-wise, as they were last season, and always finish strong; (2) they’ve already played all 3 of their Big 4 match-ups for the first half, whereas Arsenal still have to play Chelsea and Liverpool; and (3) if Hargreaves comes back and is effective, he shores up a lot of their midfield problems, which is their achilles’ heel at the moment.
Posted from
United States

-



good one martin!
Posted from
United States

-



the first reaction in the press is that…but to act like nothing is going on behind to scenes to fix and address on-pitch deficiencies is pretty ludicrous. i don’t know why you’re acting shocked..alex ferguson has been the same sort of guy when it comes to these things since i’ve been watching him.
also yesterday the midfield wasn’t the problem, i’d say the inept wide players were the problem as giggs was terrible and valencia is sort of a one trick pony. carrick, anderson, and fletcher were fine…finally.
Posted from
United States

-



watching the match, you can see that the ref was not making great calls both ways. the game got out of hand. man u was a better team. chelsea showed weakness through out. drogba getting cleats to the chest was bad, but him floundering around afterwards and kicking his feet around like an epileptic was hilarious. the best result would have been a tie but it was nice to see flaws in both those teams. arsenal are a far better team to watch, they are not as dirty, and they don’t make excuses based on a two-month old interview of a third party coach. cheers arsenal on the 2-spot and let’s get first.
Posted from
United States

-



Slight nitpick with Martin’s comment post… I just saw Liverpool drop points yet again. I don’t think they’re a “top 4 team” right now. I certainly think Man City is stronger, and should get stronger as the year goes on, and players get to know each other better. And since we’ve already played both them and Man Utd on the road, I think our schedule has been fairly difficult to this point.
Posted from
United States

-



hahahaha, this was great. thank you so much! come on the gunners!
Posted from
United States

-



BENDTNER has a problem with his groin and he needs a surgery!! it sucks
Posted from


-



man I was buying it hahaha, good one,
sucks about Bendtner, where was the news?Posted from


-



btw, the referee really was lousy, that kick from evans into drogbas chest and the yellow card for drogba, and all that in the elf meter area.
Posted from


-



on a serious note
http://www.footytube.com/video/chelsea-manchester-united-nov08-27238Posted from
United States

-



Hahahahahaha
Posted from
Serbia And Montenegro

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.












