

What’s Up With Park Chu-Young?
By: jg | October 9th, 2011
After our ignominious defeat to Manchester United (I’d H8-2 be an Arsena- *joke cut short by baseball bat swung in the face*), it was obvious that new and better signings were needed. Not just obvious, absolutely essential. And while you may argue over the reasons and quality and other minutiae regarding our new signings, the fact remains that they were signed, and none have reached Silvestre/Squillaci levels of awfulness… yet. Thanks to injuries and pressing positional needs, Per Mertesacker and Mikel Arteta have become mainstays in this new Arsenal side. Andre Santos has had a decent start to his Arsenal career, netting a goal and providing fresh competition to Kieran Gibbs to the LB role. Yossi Benayoun, who has already been hampered by a minor injury, has still managed to impress with his energetic work rate.
But the guy who has seem to have fallen by the wayside, is our resident Korean, Park Chu-Young. I don’t know if many people remember this, but the agreement of his transfer (but not his official signing) was announced BEFORE our mauling by Manchester United. So in a sense, he’s the last Arsenal signing of the BM era (Before Mediocrity). And yet, the guy cannot get a game for Arsenal at the moment. Out of the 7 matches he has been available in since his purchase (4 EPL games against Swansea, Blackburn, Bolton, Spurs; 2 CL games against Dortmund and Olympiakos; 1 CC game against Shrewsbury), he has only appeared- and started- in one, playing 71 minutes in our Carling Cup 3-1 win over League 2 side Shrewsbury.
He has featured as an unused sub in the matches against Swansea, Dortmund, Olympiakos, and Spurs.
And in the matches against Blackburn and Bolton, he didn’t appear at all. While it’s too early in his career at Arsenal to draw any sort of final conclusion regarding his purpose in the team, I think it can be argued that Park is being underused at Arsenal- and that’s something that needs to change.

Park has hit a patch of golden form ever since joining Arsenal, but the problem is, he hasn’t got the chance to show it at Arsenal. He has 6 goals in 3 games for the South Korean NT since becoming a Gunner: a hat-trick against Lebanon and a goal against Kuwait in World Cup qualifiers, and a brace against Poland in a friendly. That’s the best form he’s ever shown for his country, and it’s obvious that his promotion to captain and thus central figure, ever since Park Ji-Sung retired, has paid dividends. So why isn’t he getting any more playing time at Arsenal?
The argument is that we have decent depth at the wings, and that Park was bought with the intent of being a sub/squad player. That may be true, and I’m not going to argue for Park’s inclusion as a starter, because we haven’t gotten any chance to see him in action. When you only have 71 minutes against a League Two side as evidence of playing time, it’s safe to say you’re still an unknown quantity. And while we don’t know at the moment what Park is capable of, we sure do know what most of his competition is- Gervinho, sadly, has not turned out into the wonder-buy most were expecting him to be. Turns out adapting from Ligue 1 to the EPL has takes its time, but that being said, Gervinho has still managed to disappoint. His decision-making and passing accuracy is pretty bad, and he has shown a telling lack of team-work and synchronicity with his new team mates. His defensive work isn’t anything to write home about, either. Arshavin has further regressed from the world-class player we bought back in 2009. Walcott has improved, but still has that sort of “headless chicken” style that prevents him from maturing into a better player. Ox and Ryo have shown glimpses of quality (Ox in particular), but still lack the experience that is vital to perform consistently on the big stage (again, Ox has shown that he could have what it takes to become a big player, but he still needs more time and opportunities). So it’s safe to say none of our wingers have been exceptionally great this season, and that added competition for those two spots may be the tonic that is needed. Enter Park.
He’s not exactly prolific, but then again, none of the other wingers are, either. His work rate is said to be phenomenal, and that would at least represent a better defensive option than Gervinho or Arshavin. And finally, if you’re going to buy an experienced, international-proven player, when are you going to use him? I think everyone can agree that Park could have proved somewhat useful for us against the likes of Spurs or Blackburn. And the longer he keeps being starved of action, the more his purchase starts to reek of desperation from Wenger and co., because it would show that they thought of Park as nothing more than a potential backup to the backup of van Persie when he inevitably gets injured. A shame, because I think Park could play very well for us, if only he was given the chance.
We play Sunderland this Friday. Some are calling for Ox to get a start. Me? I’m calling for that unknown South Korean, who I bet is just raring to go.
Some Related Stories:
-
Personal Injury Law
-
Gigi_man
-
Bertrand
-
ballyanking
-
ballyanking
-
Ian
-
Orion
-
libero
-
KingBurns
-
Rico
-
CruEL
-
E Dunbar
-
Thajudin
-
Bladerunner
-
Homey_Mills
-
Bertrand
-
John
-
Benjamin Dockter
-
Homey_Mills
-
libero
-
Disappointed
-
Sasa
-
TrickyDicky
-
Martin
-
caligunner
-
Martin
-
Sfsdfsdf
-
Lachlan
-
Negredo
-
Kas123
-
Colinc4565
-
Rico
-
will
-
Rico
-
Martin
-
Stsas
-
Mugwalla
-
Pascal Zidane
-
Martin
-
Orion
-
caligunner











