

100 Best Players of the Decade
By: Martin | November 8th, 2009
The Offside’s Main Page decided to compile a list of the “100 Best Players of the Decade.” I thought it might be of some interest to you, especially since Arsenal is out of action for a couple of weeks. It was voted on by all of the Offside’s bloggers, as well as readers. I will say that I thought the criteria was a little vague–it was simply to name the 20 best players who played in the decade. But they specifically noted that we could list someone who retired in 2000, which to me meant that the list was not to come up with the players who had been the best throughout the decade of the 2000s, but rather the players who had the best overall careers who played part of their career in the 2000s. There’s no point in me reprinting the entire list here, but the following Arsenal players made the list:
100. Anelka
90. Marc Overmars
75. Kanu
71. Robert Pires
64. Freddie Ljungberg
46. Cesc Fabregas
22. Dennis Bergkamp
18. Patrick Vieira
2. Thierry Henry
9 out of the 100 best players of the decade who played a significant portion of their career at Arsenal–not bad at all. See my personal Top 20 ballot which I sent in, as well as where my Top 20 ended up on the final list, after the jump:
1. Zinedine Zidane (1)
2. Thierry Henry (2)
3. Luis Figo (10)
4. Fat Ronaldo (4)
5. Ronaldinho (3)
6. Rivaldo (23)
7. Kaka (7)
8. Lionel Messi (6)
9. Cristiano Ronaldo (5)
10. Raul (13)
11. Alan Shearer (50)
12. Roberto Baggio (48)
13. Oliver Kahn (29)
14. Samuel Eto’o (25)
15. Roy Keane (34)
16. Paolo Maldini (8)
17. Steven Gerrard (11)
18. Patrick Vieira (18)
19. Frank Lampard (26)
20. Dennis Bergkamp (22)
I think my list matched up relatively well with the overall list. I think Luis Figo deserved to be a little bit higher–he was an absolute force of nature around the turn of the milennium. I think Rivaldo similarly suffered from people forgetting just how good he was in the late 90s and early 2000s. And I thought Alan Shearer was by far the most underrated player on the list–maybe because I mainly follow the Premiership, but how can the Premiership’s all-time leading goalscorer be ranked so low? And I understand that Baggio was past it by the time 2000 came around, but he was incredible in the mid-1990s. Finally, I know Roy Keane never put up big statistics or won a lot of individual honors, but anyone who saw him week in and week out for Manchester United in his prime understands just how much of a difference-maker he was.
Anyway, lists like this are always fun, and the disagreements are part of the fun. Feel free to tell me what an idiot I am or how wrong the list is in the comments section.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Arsenal | |||
| Arsenal Scores | Emirates Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



One thing I don’t like about these lists is that without exception, goalies and defenders have a hard time making it. I think in Martin’s top 20, there’s one of each. Then there are 18 either midfielders or forwards. Not that I know every player well enough to make a better vote – it’s just a comment. It’s easy to rank forwards based on just statistics. Defenders you have to watch a lot before you can say they’re great.
On a related note, let me tell a story from something Bobby McMahon said on FSC a couple years ago. They asked him to put together something like a best 11 in Europe, or whatever. Anyway, after he posted it, the other host asked him why his midfield was all attacking players, and none were defensive. His classic reply:
“Well if I asked you to name the top 10 most beautiful women in the world, you wouldn’t put Martha Stewart in there just because she’s handy in the kitchen.” Wow. That was classic.Posted from
United States

-



Yeah, that is definitely true. I tried to put a couple of those guys in (Maldini, Kahn, Vieira, Keane), it’s too easy to remember the spectacular plays of someone like Ronaldinho over the steady solid play of someone like Cannavaro.
And some of the commenters on the big list mentioned this, particularly in regards to the “Dream 11,” which boasted a midfield of Cristiano Ronaldo, Messi, Zidane, and Ronaldinho. Hard to see any of those guys shielding the backline, but that team would still win a lot of games 7-4.
I think you’re right–it’s just in the nature of the lists/awards. It’s the same reason you never see offensive linemen (or anyone other than a quarterback or running back) winning the Heisman Trophy or NFL MVP–some guys’ jobs are easily observable and quantifiable, and guys’ aren’t.
Posted from
United States

-



No way is Lampard one of the 20 best players of the decade.
Posted from
United States

-



Fat Ronaldo at number 4? Are you kidding me?
1-Ronaldo
2-Zidane
3-Maldini
4-NestaPosted from
United States

-



Bergkamp 22???
I’m very pleased with how Arsenal is playing right now so I will refrain from extended comments right now, except for three things…
-We average an injury a game. I hope this doesn’t hurt us soon. When’s Bendtner (I call him Gumby, anyone get that?) coming back?
-I hope Diaby comes back soon. Last season, he played bad games; this season, he has bad stretches in a game. He started with his old tricks in this last game…getting caught in position, giving the ball away cheap…but improved quickly. He is really approaching consistency, and consistent Diaby is awesome Diaby.
-When he was on the field, however, we didn’t have midfield control. When Song came on, we had midfield control. When Wenger points to recent successes, he can point at Song. Gone is the inconsistent, kind of skinny DM that we knew until last year. This year, we have one of the most skillful DMs in the world.I have more about everyone else, but not right now. My hopes for this season are building immensely–right now, we are number 2. Let that just roll off your tongue for now.
Posted from
United States

-



I don’t know, I think putting the all-time leading scorer in World Cup history at # 4 player of the decade is pretty safe. 1996-97 is probably the best season any striker, and maybe any player, period, has ever had.
Posted from
United States

-



Okay, I can’t resist…
-Sagna’s crosses are getting better. They aren’t exactly great (they usually aren’t good), but he’s improving. Right now he’s getting assists of assists…the assists will come.
-Somebody said awhile ago that if Fabregas keeps playing the way he is, he will surpass Xavi as the best of “that” type, and I laughed. Now, if Xavi keeps playing the way he’s playing, Fabregas WILL surpass him. Fabregas was quite quiet against Wolves, but what he did was absolute perfection. I love his tendency to be a part-time striker when he’s needed, sometimes he’s the only man ahead of the ball.
-Then there’s Ramsey. Since most of my comments are negative, I tend to not speak about him, because there are so many negatives that one can pick on. But let’s be fair: this is a player who’s career has mostly been played in the Championship, and who is 17 (18?). His giveaways made me scream at the screen (Diaby too at the start, though he played into the game before injury). His defensive play reeked. But let’s speak positively. I loved his runs forward. I loved his effort, he knew that he wouldn’t get many chances this season, so he might as well run, run, run. His passing sucks, but that will come with another year or two of Carling Cup play. His role, in fact, perhaps made Fabregas quiet…his runs forward kept Fabregas backfield (is this good?). I refuse to write him off for the TERRIBLE GIVEAWAYS in this game, because he did enough. The passing will get better, right now I just want him to be available to make them. One more thing about him: he didn’t deserve the assist, it was yet another sloppy pass. But he got it. And really, he deserved a headed goal. I have high hopes for him, in about three years if we keep him.
-Arshavin, stop fouling people in the midfield. In fact, if you insist on doing this, then be available upfield when it counts. His second half was better than his first, but I have this constant impression of Arshavin this season: he gets way, way too much credit. Game after game, he appears to be a player purchased in an emergency situation, to put a positive spin on a poor season, and his appropriateness for Arsenal’s play comes into question more and more with every game. I like his goals, but when it comes down to it, I like ONLY his goals. He needs to gel more to prove himself, and for me, he hasn’t really gelled.Posted from
United States

-



One last eency bitty thing–I propose Song’s name be changed to “The Orchestra,” when he plays well.
Posted from
United States

-



Junaid:
Sorry, I’m an idiot–I misread your comment as saying that Ronaldo shouldn’t be in the top 4. I think you could make a case that he should be higher, granted. But I think Zidane is one of the all-time greats, and Henry and Figo both played at a very high level for a long, long time. As for Nesta’s exclusion from my list, what can I say? I don’t follow Italian football all that much and didn’t know much about him, but his credentials are certainly impressive. That may also account for why I put Lampard in my top 20–maybe there were players in Spain, Italy, or Germany who were better, but all I know is that Lampard is still really fearsome to play against–his right foot is a cannon and he can pop up and score from virtually anywhere in the opponents’ half of the field.
Posted from
United States

-



Could you explain the Baggio one without referring to a time period that is well over a decade ago?
Posted from
United States

-



GREAT JOB, I LOVE LISTS, IT S FUN AND STARTS DISCUSSIONS, AND ALSO PAYS SOME TRIBUTES,
MARTIN YOUR LIST WAS ACCURATE, I AGREE WIYH ZIZOU, EVEN IF NEVER PLAYED WITH ARSENAL, HE WAS REALLY A MAGICIAN, HARRY POTTER AS NICKNAMED IN ESPN LATAM,
TITI WELL EARNED THE 2ND PLACE, DENNIS AND PIRES, WELL ITS GREAT TO SEE THEM IN THERE
junaid
i am big faAN OF FAT RONNIE , BIG ENOUGH TO HATE CR9 FOR CALLING HIMSELF LIKE THAT WHEN HIS FIRST NAME IS CRISTIANO AND I THINK HE DID IT TO STEAL SOME LIGHTS, BUT ZIZOU OVERPLAYED AND WON TO FAT R EVERY TIME THEY CONFRONTED EACH OTHER AT LEAST IN WORLD CUPS, sorry for the big letters i write watchin the keys ….
Posted from
United States

-



Bergkamps way too low…
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.












