Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink

By: Martin | November 5th, 2009

There’s not much else to say other than that that was a sublime performance by Arsenal. The trophy draught is frustrating, but honestly, when Arsenal plays like they did last night, dominating another club through sheer skill, technique, and teamwork, it just reminds me how lucky I am to root for Arsenal.

Anyway, first things first. I know that technically, mathematically, we haven’t qualified for the knockout stages yet. But the sequence of events that would have to happen to keep us out is EXTREMELY unlikely. I mean, we’re talking about “Jon and Kate’s kids grow up to be normal, emotionally stable adults” unlikely. I mean, we’re talking about “Transformers 2 sweeps the Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director (Michael Bay), Best Actor (Shia Lebeouf), and Best Actress (Megan Fox)” unlikely. I mean, we’re talking about “Heidi and Spencer get Ph.Ds in molecular biology and work together to cure cancer” unlikely. I mean, we’re talking about “Chelsea failing to win and their fans not immediately blaming the referee” unlikely. Okay, I’ve got a million of them, but you get the idea. It’s unlikely. We ARE through to the knockout stages, and that’s how I’m proceeding.

The question addressed by Homey and others in the comments after last night’s game was whether we should try to win the group or be content with second place. The past few years, Arsene Wenger has seemingly been very content to finish second in the group, so long as we advance–look at the lineup we trotted out against Porto on Matchday 6 last season. That was basically the Carling Cup squad plus Almunia and Gallas.

But last year, the clubs who were in the pool of first-place finishers wasn’t that much different than the pool of second place finishers. Behold the two pools, with their UEFA Ranking coefficient (coming into the 2008-2009 season) in parentheses:

First-place: Roma (16), Panathinaikos (37), Barca(4), Liverpool(3), Manchester United(6), Bayern(11), Porto(17), Juventus(23)

Second-place: Chelsea(1), Inter(9), Sporting(21), Atletico(67), Villareal(13), Lyon(8), Arsenal(5), Real Madrid(10)

Average ranking of first-place teams: 14.625; average ranking of second-place teams: 18, although that’s really just dragged down by Atletico’s bizarrely low ranking. Both groups had 6 teams ranked in the top 20, one club just outside the top 20, and one club substantially lower. In fact, the second-place teams had more top 10-ranked clubs (5) than the first-place group (3). Ask clubs like Roma (who drew Arsenal in the first-round) and Juventus (who drew Chelsea) how much good finishing first did them.

But I do think this year may turn out to be quite a bit different. More so than in past years it seems like there are a number of smaller clubs which may well sneak into the knockout stages: If CSKA Moscow can beat Wolfsburg at home next matchday, they have a very good chance at going through, Romanian side Unirea Urziceni (gesundheit!) has a decent chance to make it, Rubin Kazan and/or Dynamo Kiev both have a better-than-you-think shot at getting out of Group F.

There is no such thing as an “easy” draw in a European knock-out tie (PSV taught us that), but there’s no doubt that some draws are more desirable than others. Sure, if we win our group, there’s a chance we could draw with a Barca, Juventus, or Real Madrid. But if there’s a 1 in 4 or better chance we could draw a club from Eastern Europe not accustomed to playing at this level, it’s worth it.

It’s also worth noting that at this point, it wouldn’t take much for us to win the group. All we have to do is beat Standard Liege at the Emirates. Standard has shown quite a bit more than people thought they would, and will almost certainly host AZ on the last Matchday with a good shot at getting into the Europa League knockout stages. But without discrediting them, the fact is that we should win this match easily. I say we should play most of our first-team against them, take care of business there, and then we can basically just send the Carling Cup team to Greece in December, and make sure our stars are rested and focused on Liverpool the following weekend.

As for the match itself, we were in control from start to finish. van Persie very nearly started the game with a bang in the 3rd minute with a brilliant shot which was just pushed around the post by Romero (and it was all downhill from there for the young Argentine keeper). Then we had a period where we struggled to create real chances, but in the 25th minute, Cesc took a crafty shot from outside the box which wrong-footed Romero, who couldn’t get enough of a hand on it to keep it out. It was bad keeping, but it was a nice shot by Cesc to force Romero into making as top, and he was rewarded. We continued to press until, right before the break, Arshavin put a nice ball forward to Nasri, who beat his man and then put a composed finish past Romero. It was a nice play and a great moment for Nasri, scoring a goal in his first start on the season.

We struck again shortly after the break. It was again down to Arshavin, who put Cesc through on goal beautifully, and Cesc relaxed and finished nicely. Throughout this, AZ created very few chances, the best of which was a nearly point-blank shot in the 56th minute that Almunia did very well to push up off the crossbar. Then, in the 72nd minute, we conjured up a bit of magic–Eduardo back-heeled a wonderful ball forward to Arshavin, who took on his man and put Diaby through on goal in the box, and Diaby finished well.

Then, in the 82nd minute, off a corner kick where we could have had a penalty for a handball in the box, AZ countered, and substitute Lens caught Almunia leaning to score a consolation goal. And that’s how it ended, 4-1 Arsenal.

It was a beautiful performance, and showed what the club is capable of. Nasri looked good in his first start, and gives us another option both up front and in midfield. I also think we may have figured out how to play with a lead, which had been a problem. And that is wholeheartedly embracing the old cliche that a best defense is a good offense. The problem is that Arsenal don’t have the size to defend set pieces or crosses into the box very well, and the players aren’t used to playing conservatively. Based on how we’ve played the past two matches with the lead, I think at this point the best thing the club can do is just keep attacking–if we keep the ball in the other side’s half they can’t score, and the best way to protect a two-goal lead is by scoring a third goal. The corner kick which led to the counter was drawn by Gallas making a run into the box. This was with the club up 4-0, in the 81st minute. And that seems to work much better for us than playing tentatively and staying back, so that’s fine by me.

Anyway, on to the ratings:

Almunia 6.5. Saved one goal through a spectacular save, gave up a soft goal by leaning the wrong way. It all evens out, I suppose. Didn’t really have too much to do.

Eboue 6. Showed what he is capable of by making several marauding runs down the flank and through the middle. Also showed what he is capable of by leaving the right-side exposed several times.

Gibbs 7.Looked comfortable filling in for Clichy, and very nearly grabbed a goal for his troubles. I think he’ll continue to improve as he matures and gets used to playing with the first-team.

Vermaelen 7. Generally untroubled, made a few forward runs, marked his man well.

Gallas 7. Ditto. Was really getting forward a lot, too.

Song 6.5. Solid performance–consistently shielded the back four and won the ball in midfield. He needs to abandon his delusions about making spectacular through balls, though–the few times he tried to put someone through on goal he just gave the ball away. As long as he plays within himself he helps the team a lot.

Diaby 7.5. Grabbed the goal, worked hard, and generally had one of his best games of the season. But I still don’t think he should be starting if everyone else is healthy.

Cesc 8.5. Co-Man of the Match. Worked hard, grabbed two solid goals. Good day for the rudder of the Arsenal. Based on recent form, is he the best midfielder in the world at the moment? 8 goals and 11 assists in 13 games would point the Ouija planchette towards “yes.”

Nasri 7.5 Disappeared for long stretches, but when he did get involved, reminded us what he’s capable of contributing. Beautiful move to get past his man and finish on the goal. He’ll only get better as he gets fit again and shakes off the rust.

Arshavin 8.5. Co-Man of the Match. He hasn’t been playing that well lately, but he bounced back in a big way last night with numerous dangerous runs, and three assists. He seemed to be popping up everywhere, it was a great game. Not to rain on that parade, but does it bother anyone else that he doesn’t actually seem all that happy when Arsenal score? You almost never see him run over to congratulate the scorer as enthusastically as the rest of the team. Hmmmm.

van Persie 7. Didn’t score for what seems like the first time in a while, but was still involved in everything and looked dangerous.

Wenger’s Tie 7 Solid, even underneath his big winter jacket.

Eduardo 7. I still think his loss of pace will keep him from ever being the same player he was before the injury, but he still has a world of skill, as he showed on the backheel that started the move that led up to the 4th goal.

Ramsey 6. Nondescript.

Rosicky 6.5. Looked lively in a brief cameo.

Raspberry Peach Snapple 10. Holy crap. I’ve never really seen this flavor before, so I picked it up to drink while I was watching the match last night, and this must be what heroin is like. You hardly ever see this, but if you see a place that sells them, trust me–buy all of them and horde them. Or just drink them all at once. You won’t regret it.

We’re almost 1/3 of the way through the season, and I think you’d have to be pretty content with things so far. Diaby’s headed own goal against Manchester United and the collapse against West Ham notwithstanding, we’ve made a very bright start to the season. We just need to do a professional job on Saturday away to Wolves, and since at least one of Chelsea or Manchester United will drop points, a win will put us functionally second in the table (remember the game in hand). Not bad.

The other news is that Stan Kroenke bought up a few hundred more shares of Arsenal, taking him right to the brink of the 29.9% takeover threshold. I am completely confused by this whole thing, and can’t tell if he’s content to be a silent investor or he actually wants control of the club. If it’s the latter, both the current board and the Arsenal Supporters’ Trust seems okay with it, so he’s at least convinced them that a takeover by him wouldn’t actually change how the club is run. We shall see.



Arsenal EPL Match ScheduleBet on Arsenal games Travel to soccer games Discount Travel to London & Arsenal
Arsenal ScoresBuy arsenal TicketsEmirates Stadium information & hotels



Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink digg:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink reddit:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink fark:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink Y!:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink stumbleupon:Arsenal 4-AZ 1; Kroenke on the Brink

Comments   |  Add your comment

  • vespo |  November 5th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    cornercorner

    100 of the shares Kroenke just bought were purchased from Peter Hill-Wood. I’m taking that as tacit acceptance by the board towards Kroenke’s (inevitable?) pending takeover.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Tom |  November 5th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    cornercorner

    Just spit coffee all over my keyboard at the snapple rating.

    Brilliant.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Homey |  November 5th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    cornercorner

    I’m with you on hoping we win the group and thus draw a 2nd place team. But the more I think about it, the more I’d just play the Carling Cup team (more or less) in both games. All we’d need is any of the following: a win vs. Liege, a loss or draw by Olympiakos at Alkmaar, or a win or draw at Olympiakos. I think it’s at least even money that Olympiakos won’t win at Alkmaar, and then it’s over regardless of what we do (and yes, I’m assuming they can’t overturn their 8 goal difference).
    So let’s play some of the kids and let the horses rest in both games.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Homey |  November 5th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    cornercorner

    I’m not sure if there are any experts in English takeover law, but the process is still a bit confusing to me. Would he HAVE to make a bid for ALL the remaining shares, or just enough to put him over 50%? And would anyone HAVE to sell to him? What if he gets to 30% ownership, and then decides he doesn’t want to buy any more? Is there some sort of penalty for that? I read somewhere that he’d just have to wait another 6 months or something before buying more.
    Ok, please help a brotha out. Thanks.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Martin |  November 5th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    cornercorner

    Yeah, I’m not sure what the precise rule is there. It doesn’t make sense to me that he would have to accept any sellers beyond 50.1% if all he wants is control, but I don’t understand why he’s required to launch a formal takeover bid once he gets to the arbitrary 30% threshold, either. Don’t understand English law (but frankly, I didn’t exactly pay great attention in my Corporations class, either, so I can’t claim any real expertise in American corporate law, either).

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • vespo |  November 5th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    cornercorner

    @Homey – I’ve copied and pasted the following from the BBC website:

    -Once someone reaches a 30% shareholding in a company they are deemed by the Takeover Panel to have “effective control” of the firm and must then make an offer for the remaining shares.

    -The price offered cannot be lower than the highest price the offerer has paid for shares in the firm in the previous 12 months.

    -If, after the offer has been made, the offerer has more than 50% of the shares they are deemed to have been successful in their takeover and legally in control.

    -If an offer is unsuccessful and the 50% shareholding level is not breached then the offerer cannot come back with another takeover attempt for 12 months, unless invited to do so by the company.

    So it sounds like when he reaches 30%, he MUST make a bid for ALL remaining shares at a set price. Shareholders then decide on their own terms whether or not to sell to him. Then after every shareholder makes a decision on whether or not to sell (I’m sure there are details for the time alotted for all this), we check and see if Kroenke has broken the 50% mark.

    My only major remaining question is what happens if he doesn’t hit 50%. I’m assuming he is still allowed to buy the shares that people have agreed to sell, so he might get stuck at 40%. Does “waiting 12 months” mean he can’t purchase any more shares, as that would re-trigger the clause about broaching 30%? Or does it mean he cannot attempt to purchase enough shares that would allow him to clear the 50% mark?

    As for penalties, I believe this is all watched by the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers which has jurisdiction in the City of London. It sounds like they’re powerful enough to force Kroenke to follow the regulations by threatening with appropriate legal action if he doesn’t.

    The BBC’s article:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8343943.stm

    A good summary from a Mergers and Acquisitions Law Professor at UCLA:
    http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2009/11/sports-takeovers.html

    And (if anyone has a burning desire to sort through 282 pages of British law) the official Takeover Code:
    http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf

    Hope this helps (and someone please clarify if they understand it better!)

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Homey |  November 5th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    cornercorner

    Thanks vespo. It still seems like nobody is forced to sell, so I dunno how he can magically get to 50% even after he gets to 30%. I also wonder what it means by “effective control” at 30%. Is there some extra power at that point? It’s all a bit puzzling.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Jonathan |  November 5th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    cornercorner

    With regards the takeover this article may be of interest to some of you:

    http://www.just-football.com/2009/11/arsenal-safe-kroenke-takeover-usmanov.html

    I think a takeover looms large, but as the article suggests, not for a while yet.

    And btw you’re right, raspberry peach Snapple is tha shiznit.

    Posted from United Kingdom United Kingdom

    cornercorner

Leave a Reply

If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse our
Commenting Guidelines.


England National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email arsenal[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives