

Cesc Out, Sol Down, Philippe Up in the Air
By: Martin | August 25th, 2009A little bit of news round-up from the early part of this week. First off, Cesc has been ruled out for tomorrow’s clash with Celtic. But this doesn’t really tell us anything. Wenger has said that it might have just been a slight tweak, in which case he could be ready to play against Manchester United on Saturday; or it could have been a pull, in which case he could be out for 3 weeks. It’s still unclear. I will say that we’ve got to take the long view here–as much as we need Cesc to play against United, if he’s still injured at all, I think Wenger should sit him, because that would also give us solid ground to hold Cesc out of the international break the following two weeks, and make sure he’s healthy and rested for the group stages and some very important league fixtures in September. I will of course keep you posted.
There are also transfer rumors continuing to float around. We’re still linked with St. Etienne midfielder Blaise Matuidi, although Wenger seems to have shot that one down. I don’t know anything about Matuidi, but he’s young and cheap, and plays a position where we desperately need cover. It’s hard for me to see how splashing out a couple million pounds on a decent holding midfielder would be a bad move at this point.
Wenger has also said that there is “no news” on Philippe Senderos. I think most of us logically assumed that since the Jolean Lescott sale finally went through, Senderos would be brought in to fill that void, but it now looks like that may not necessarily be true. I’m a bigger fan of Senderos than most, but I really think he shouldn’t be sold unless a replacement is brought in. I’ll grant that he definitely should not start over Vermaelen, Gallas, or even Djourou, but he’ll provide valuable cover as a fourth-choice center back, and he keeps Silvestre further down the depth chart, which is a good thing. But I think the issue here is that Senderos isn’t happy with his role at the club and wants a chance to be a first-choice center-back somewhere. Which, frankly, is understandable–he’s in his prime and wants a chance to prove himself, and won’t get that chance at Arsenal.
In other news, Arsenal great Sol Campbell has agreed to a five-year deal with League Two side Notts County, which surprised Arsene Wenger. Sol won two league titles and three FA Cups in his years with the club, and was a stalwart of the backline. He also scored the goal that gave Arsenal a 1-0 lead in the Champions League final against Barcelona. He played for Portsmouth last season, and could have continued playing the Premiership, or at least a high level league elsewhere in Europe, but for whatever reason (and by “whatever reason,” I mean “money”) decided to ply his trade at the bottom level of English professional football. But it’s his career, and his legacy is secure, so best of luck to him.
Finally, young academy product striker Jay Simpson appears to be headed to Championship side QPR on a season-long loan. I’ve said in this space before that Simpson has the ability to be a decent Premiership striker, but I just don’t think he’s got what it takes to play for Arsenal. But this will be a good chance for him to get first-team football at a high level and show what kind of player he is. I also realize that I’ve probably let a couple loan announcements sneak through the cracks. In addition to Simpson, the following players are out on loan:
Henri Lansbury–Watford (England–Championship)(until the end of 2009)
Havard Nordtveit–Nurnberg (Germany–Bundesliga) (until end of season)
Pedro Botelho–Celta Vigo (Spain–Segunda Division) (until end of season)
Jay Emmanuel-Thomas–Blackpool (England–Championship) (until end of September, but probably longer)
Those are great opportunities for those players to prove themselves at a high level of football, and hopefully some of them will do well enough to convince Wenger that they’re “Arsenal-quality” footballers.
Preview of the second leg of the Celtic match up sometime tonight…
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Arsenal | |||
| Arsenal Scores | Emirates Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



If we keep Senderos, I don’t see why there wouldn’t be a situation where he’d get plenty of action. For instance, with Djourou out, I’d start him against Celtic this week. Rest one of the 2 main starters. Then play him in the Carling Cup and a few other games sprinkled in. He’d be either our 3rd or 4th CB. On a team in all the competitions, there will be plenty of chances. What’s not to like?
Posted from
United States

-



Homey–
I tend to agree, but I think it’s hard for us to really put ourselves in his shoes. He is 24 now, so he’s no longer a “developing player”–this is as good as he’s going to get, and he wants to show it.
It also must be frustrating to him because his status at the club has fallen. Remember, other than Cesc, he’s the only person left at the club who started the 2005 FA Cup Final, the last time Arsenal won a trophy. He was a critical part of the defense that set the record for least goals allowed in the following year’s Champions League campaign. After that season, Wenger had a long talk with Tony Adams about possibly appointing Senderos club captain before ultimately deciding to give the armband to Thierry Henry. So he’s gone from being backline stalwart and key player to being the 4th string center back, a guy who can provide injury cover and start in the Carling Cup.
So I love Arsenal, and I like Senderos, and I’d be very happy if he stayed at the club, because I think we could use him this season. But I can’t really bedrudge him if he wants to leave to a solid team like Everton where he’d be one of the team’s first-choice 11 and a key contributor.
Posted from
United States

-



Martin’s the man for Arsenal history. I see what you’re saying. But I’ll stick with my point. I’d personally much rather be a part of a team that could really win something, or at least go deep in meaningful tournaments, and play in about 1/3 of the matches. That, compared to playing 2/3 of the matches for a mid-table team that won’t realistically win anything.
Posted from
United States

-



too bad for Cesc but it gives a chance to show/ prove / (or check?) that we are a strong team this season. Dont get me wrong I think Cesc is the best player we have, but a team is composed of more than one and we cant rely always on him, and , most imporant, he needs to be fit so he has to rest.
Senderos? he is strong and powerful, and Martin refreshing my memory, a part of the histroy of the team. Hope he d stay, going to another club where you have no traces (big or small team) makes you lose perspective, look at the dumb move from Hleb after all.
Here is a wish for the Gunners tomorrow, so it arrives in their sleep!Posted from
United States

-



I disagree with you, cesc is not the best player we have…
robin and arshavin are superior to him, still I think in the long run cesc will become a better player.
Posted from
United States

-



let me rephrase, for my own cohesive statement

yes, arshavin is superior in my book, but i think cesc is a symbol (cesc symbol lets say haha). Abd a s a symbol i thnik, in my book, it makes him have more points, maybe only because i have this image of the team he has lead and andrei has more to show still?
I hope today andrei gives me a reason in my earlier appointmentPosted from
United States

Comments are closed












