

Chelsea Preview
By: Martin | May 9th, 2009Chelsea
Current Position: 3rd, 22-8-5 (74 points, +38 goal differential)
Away Form: 12-2-3
Recent Form: WWDWW
Last Meeting: Arsenal 1-Chelsea 2 (4/18/09) (neutral site)
Well, the Chelsea rematch is tomorrow. It’s kind of a “rubber match” of sorts with our London rivals–we beat them 2-1 at Stamford Bridge earlier in the season, and they beat us 2-1 at Wembley last month. “Best 2 out of 3,” I suppose.
Regardless, this game feels strangely anticlimactic to me. Neither team can win the league at this point, and both teams will be extremely demoralized by what happened this week–Chelsea because they played good enough to win but didn’t, us because we didn’t play anywhere near good enough to win.
What about 3rd place, you ask? As I’ve said before here, there’s a big difference between finishing 3rd and 4th this year because of the change in the Champions League qualifying rules. But frankly, I just don’t think we can catch Chelsea. We’re 6 points down, and they’ve got a big lead in goal differential. So, practically, we’ve got to make up 7 points on them in 3 games. Even if you assume we beat them tomorrow, we’ve got to make up 4 points in the remaining 2 games against United and Stoke. Chelsea, on the other hand, has Blackburn at home and Sunderland away. If they win either of those games, they lock up 3rd. I’d love to be optimistic about it, but I just don’t see it happening.
So I think both teams will be kind of emotionally exhausted and burned out from everything that happened mid-week. There’s nothing really to play for other than pride. But pride is important–to put it simply, it’s always a big game when Arsenal plays Chelsea, even if nothing is tangibly on the line. I won’t get too negative, but if you read this regularly, you know I don’t like Chelsea. I think they’re my least favorite team in the Premiership. I don’t like the “outspend everyone” team-building strategy, I don’t like their style of play, which is effective but unappealing, and I don’t like the way they carry themselves, with the diving and constant harassment and bullying of the officials. So even if it won’t win us any trophies or ultimately improve our league position, I don’t like them and I want to beat them. I hope our players feel the same way.
We’re playing at home, which is an advantage for us, although Chelsea have actually been much better away than they have at home this year. I’m really interested to see how the teams respond. How do we respond to being soundly beaten and embarrassed at home by one of your biggest rivals? How do they respond to being in control of a match for 180+ minutes, only to see it suddenly evaporate at the last second? Both are devastating, in different ways, and it will be interesting to see mentally how the squads come out. Wenger said “it’s down to the team that deals best with disappointment.” I think that’s right.
Bad news for us is that Arshavin may be out with the flu (presumably of the human, not swine, variety)–hopefully if he can’t play he’ll climb into his tiny bed and take a thimbleful of medicine and be ready to come out and give United some problems next week. Probable lineup:
Almunia
Sagna-Toure-Djourou-Gibbs
Walcott-Fabregas-Song-Nasri
Adebayor-van Persie
Here’s hoping we can come back with a stong performance. It’s always nice to beat Chelsea and we could do with a win over a quality side to boost our confidence after the terrible performance on Tuesday. Gibbs, in particular, could use a good performance to wash the bad taste out of his dreadful mistake on Tuesday out of his mouth. If nothing else, the game’s an excuse to drink on Sunday morning.
Come on Arsenal.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Arsenal | |||
| Arsenal Scores | Emirates Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



I’m thinking why not give some of the other guys a shot from here on out. I’d like to see more of Eduardo, Vela, Ramsey, Diaby, Fabianski, etc. Wouldn’t hurt to give them a few more looks at EPL matches.
Posted from
United States

-



EDuardo and Vela would be good if Arshavin does not play…but man I wish the russian wakes up without the flu….
I thnik we bet them in a time we were not good enough, now the team i beter, aside from that catastrophic game vs man u,Posted from
United States

-



If Gibbs really played, then We’re doomed! He’ll slip again when he’ll face Drogba. That boy was bought by Ferguson to do such a stupid mistake. They say he had nightmare about it; he should because his chances to play in the left spot has been largely questioned. I hope that Clichy comes back, then we can claim back Armand Traore and finally use Gibbs elsewhere.
Posted from
United States

-



I would respectfully disagree re: Gibbs.
The young man put an several impressive performance against Villareal, and was massive in the first leg against Ronaldo, and didn’t let him do anything on the wing. The fact that he slipped does not mean he’s not a good player–stuff like that could happen to anyone, and I hope the Emirates faithful give him a warm reception today because I think he is going to be an important member of Arsenal teams for years to come and it would do his confidence a world of good.
Posted from
United States

-



HAHA! Well, he won’t have this chance when Clichy comes back. An important player? How can he be such player if Clichy will be there to block him. As we know it, Wenger won’t take any chances to play an inexperienced player in Clichy’s spot since he has been criticized for his work’s ethics.
He has been so much influenced by the fans, that he is considering to buy new, but experienced player during the summer. Even thought I believe it’s because he has seen the result with Arshevin and is willing to give another go. He said that it wouldn’t be a new striker. I hope it’s a defensive midfielder to partner Fabregas.
So, He won’t take the chance to start an nineteen years old player again. Or else, his credibility will take another major blow. He REALLY needs to win something new season, or then, you’ll hear about the fan singing for Chelsea. So, Gibbs, even thought he had potential, wasn’t meant to play Clichy’s vacant post. It was Eboue who should have played that spot.
Then, Gibbs is 19 years old. Clichy is 22, if I’m not mistaking. Their age difference is very little. Gibbs won’t have a lot of opportunity, if we consider Armand Traore. Then, if Wenger decides to put him on the left side of midfield, there’ll be a major problem: Nasri, Arshevin, Walcott (sometime..) and many other are already playing this post. I say: let’s loan him. If he’s exceptional then, let take him back and put him in the right side. If not, let’s sell him for an decent amount of money pretending that he’ll be the next Ashley Cole!
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












